A
Comparison of Psoas Compartment Block and Spinal and General Anesthesia
for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy
Christopher J. Jankowski, MD, James R. Hebl, MD, Michael
J. Stuart, MD, Michael G. Rock, MD, Mark W. Pagnano, MD, Christopher
M. Beighley, MS, Darrell R. Schroeder, MS, and Terese T. Horlocker,
MD
Anesth
Analg 2003;97:1003-1009
The optimal anesthetic technique for outpatient knee arthroscopy
remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated surgical operating
conditions, patient satisfaction, recovery times, and postoperative
analgesic requirements associated with psoas compartment block, general
anesthetic, or spinal anesthetic techniques. Sixty patients were randomized
to receive a propofol/nitrous oxide/fentanyl general anesthetic, spinal
anesthesia with 6 mg of bupivacaine and 15 µg of fentanyl, or
psoas compartment block with 40 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine. All patients
received IV ketorolac and intraarticular bupivacaine. The frequency
of postanesthesia recovery room admission was 13 (65%) of 20 for patients
receiving general anesthesia, compared with 0 of 21 for patients receiving
spinal anesthesia and 1 (5%) of 19 for patients receiving psoas block
(P < 0.001). The median time from the end of surgery to meeting
hospital discharge criteria did not differ across groups (131, 129,
and 110 min for general, spinal, and psoas groups, respectively).
In the hospital, 45% of general anesthesia patients received opioid
analgesics, compared with 14% of spinal anesthesia and 21% of psoas
block patients (P = 0.087). There was no difference among groups with
respect to the time of first analgesic use or the number of patients
requiring opioid analgesia. Pain scores were highest in patients receiving
general anesthesia at 30 min (P = 0.032) and at 60, 90, and 120 min
(P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction with anesthetic technique (P
= 0.025) and pain management (P = 0.009) differed significantly across
groups; patients receiving general anesthesia reported lower satisfaction
ratings. We conclude that spinal anesthesia or psoas block is superior
to general anesthesia for knee arthroscopy when considering resource
utilization, patient satisfaction, and postoperative analgesic management.
IMPLICATIONS: Outpatient knee arthroscopy may be
performed using a variety of anesthetic techniques. We report that
spinal anesthesia and psoas compartment block are superior to general
anesthesia when considering resource utilization, patient satisfaction,
and postoperative analgesic management.
The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicines by Surgical
Patients: A Follow-Up Survey Study
Shu-Ming Wang, MD, Alison A. Caldwell-Andrews, PhD, and Zeev N. Kain,
MD
Anesth
Analg 2003;97:1010-1015
In a previous study, we indicated that 42% of surgical outpatients
are interested in using acupuncture as a treatment modality for preoperative
anxiety. We designed this follow-up survey to assess differences in
attitude toward complementary-alternative medical therapies (CAM)
between patients undergoing outpatient surgeries and those undergoing
inpatient surgeries. The results indicate that most surgical patients
(57.4%) use some form of CAM, including self-prayer (praying for their
own health; 29%), chiropractic treatment (23%), massage therapy (15%),
relaxation (14%), herbs (13%), megavitamins (9%), and acupuncture
(7%). Inpatient surgical respondents reported using self-prayer more
than outpatient surgical respondents, but no other differences in
CAM use were found between inpatient and outpatient respondents. More
inpatient respondents reported disclosing their usage of CAM to perioperative
physicians than did outpatient respondents. Most surgical patients
were willing to accept CAM as part of their perioperative management
but were not willing to pay out-of-pocket for CAM treatment. The leading
CAM therapies that fewer of the respondents were willing to pay for
out-of-pocket included relaxation, massage, chiropractic medicine,
herbs, and acupuncture.
IMPLICATIONS: Most surgical patients use some form
of complementary-alternative medical therapies (CAM) and are willing
to accept CAM therapy as part of their perioperative management.
The Effects of Preoperative Inflammation on the Analgesic
Efficacy of Intraarticular Piroxicam for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy
Seval Izdes, MD, Sibel Orhun, MD, Sacit Turanli, MD, Ezgi Erkilic,
MD, and Orhan Kanbak, MD
Anesth
Analg 2003;97:1016-1019
We conducted a double-blinded study in 90 patients undergoing elective
arthroscopic knee surgery to determine whether there is a role of
inflammation in the analgesic efficacy of intraarticular piroxicam.
Standardized general anesthetic techniques were used for all patients.
At the end of the operation, after harvesting synovial biopsies, patients
were randomized into three intraarticular groups equally. Group 1
received 25 mL saline, Group 2 received 25 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, and
Group 3 received 25 mL 0.25% bupivacaine and piroxicam 20 mg. After
microscopic examination of the synovial materials, the patients were
divided into two subgroups, inflammation positive (I+) and inflammation
negative (I-). Preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 2, 4, and
6 h, pain levels, analgesic duration, and postoperative analgesic
consumption were recorded. Analgesic duration was significantly longer
in the I+ subgroup than the I- subgroup of Group 3 (P < 0.05).
Pain scores at 1, 2, and 4 h postoperatively were significantly lower
in the I+ subgroup than the I- subgroup of Group 3 (P < 0.05),
whereas there were no significant differences among the subgroups
of Group 1 and 2. We concluded that preoperative inflammation is one
of the most important determinants of analgesic efficacy of intraarticular
piroxicam.
IMPLICATIONS: Intraarticular administration of piroxicam
along with bupivacaine improves postoperative analgesia in synovial
inflammation before surgery.
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA
- TOP
Piroxicam
gel, compared to EMLA cream is associated with less pain after venous
cannulation in volunteers
Amitabh Dutta, MD, Goverdhan Dutt Puri, MD PhD and Jyotsna Wig, MD
FAMS
Canadian
Journal of Anesthesia 50:775-778 (2003)
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy
and anti-inflammatory effects of topical piroxicam gel vs eutectic
mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) cream applied to the peripheral
venous cannulation site in adult volunteers.
Methods: Piroxicam gel and EMLA cream were randomly applied on the
dorsum of the right and left hand of ten volunteers who acted as their
own control. A venous cannula was inserted (no iv infusion) and removed
after one hour. Pain scores and signs of inflammation were noted at
the cannulation site up to 48 hr.
Results: Pain scores with piroxicam gel were higher
on cannulation and on advancement of the cannula (P < 0.05). Thereafter,
pain scores were significantly higher with EMLA (P < 0.05). Blanching
was present at all the peripheral venous sites treated with EMLA cream.
Signs of inflammation (erythema, edema) were not more frequent with
EMLA than with piroxicam (P > 0.05). Induration was more frequent
with EMLA at six hours.
Conclusion: In volunteers EMLA cream is associated
with less pain on cannulation and cannula advancement compared to
piroxicam gel. Topical application of piroxicam gel before peripheral
venous cannulation alleviates pain and, possibly, inflammation in
the period subsequent to cannulation itself.
The anterior combined approach via a single skin injection
site allows lower limb anesthesia in supine patients
Pierre Pandin, MD, Nathalie Vancutsem, MD, Jean Corentin Salengros,
MD, Isabelle Huybrechts, MD and Arlette Vandesteene, MD PhD
Canadian
Journal of Anesthesia 50:801-804 (2003)
Purpose: Lower limb anesthesia (LLA) requires the
combination of, at least, three-in-one and sciatic nerve (SCN) blocks.
Anterior approaches are easier to perform with minimal discomfort
in supine patients, specially for traumatology. Feasibility of a single
needle entry combined approach is reported.
Clinical features: The combined landmark was applied
in 119 ASA I and II patients (32–68 yr) scheduled for surgery
below the knee. Needle (nerve stimulation applied through a single
150-mm long b-bevelled insulated needle) was inserted at the midpoint
between the two classical approaches. Thirty and 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine
were injected close to the femoral and the SCN, respectively. During
the following 45 min, the extent of sensory block and knee and ankle
motor block were assessed.
Landmarks were determined within 1.7 min (0.7–2.2 min). The
entire procedure was performed within 4.2 min (2.9–7.1 min)
from the determination of the landmark to the SCN infiltration. The
three-in-one technique was successful in 89.9% while SCN was successful
in 94.9%. Femoral and tibial nerves were always blocked. Blockade
of the posterior cutaneous femoral nerve was observed in 78% of patients.
The extent and the quality of the sensory block always allowed surgery.
Additional iv sedation was needed in 32.6% of patients. Motor block
(adapted Bromage’s scale > 2) was observed in the femoral
(98.3%), the obturator (84.8%), the tibial (97.4%) and the common
peroneal (85.7%) nerve distributions. No important adverse effects
were recorded.
Conclusion: The anterior combined approach via a
single needle entry represents a technically easy and reliable technique
to perform LLA in the supine patient.
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA
SCANDINAVICA - TOP
Unusual
foreign body in the esophagus: A challenge for the anesthesiologist
Acta
J. Abrão, K. M. Khabbaz, J. M. Abrão, D. J.
Coutinho, E. A. C. Juliano
Anaesthesiologica
Scandinavica Volume 47: Issue 9, 1176-1177
A foreign body in the esophagus is usually removed by endoscopy.
An elder man entered the emergency room dyspneic and dysphagic. A
chest X-ray showed that he had a table fork stuck in the upper esophagus.
An endoscopist tried to remove it without success. After bilateral
block of the superior laryngeal nerve, transtracheal injection, topical
anesthesia of the mouth, and sedation, an awake laryngoscopy was carried
out. Pushing the laryngoscope into the opening of the esophagus the
fork was seen and extracted by the anesthesiologist. This case focuses
on the role of the anesthesiologist in the removal of esophageal foreign
bodies.
Changes in onset time of rocuronium in patients pretreated
with ephedrine and esmolol – the role of cardiac output
T. Ezri, P. Szmuk, R. D. Warters, R. E. Gebhard, E. G. Pivalizza,
J. Katz
Acta
Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Volume 47: Issue 9, Pages 1067-1072
Background: We investigated the hypothesis that
manipulation of cardiac output (CO) with esmolol (Es) or ephedrine
(E) affects the onset time of rocuronium.
Methods: Following anesthesia induction, 33 patients
received E (70 µg kg-1), Es (500 µg kg-1)
or placebo (P) 30 s before rocuronium (0.6 mg kg-1)
administration. Cardiac output was measured non-invasively after intubation
every 3 min. The interval from the end of rocuronium administration
to the disappearance of all twitches was considered to be the onset
time.
Results: Onset time was shorter after E (52.2 ±
16.5 s) and longer after Es (114.3 ± 11.1 s) compared with
P (87.4 ± 7.3 s) (P < 0.0001). Cardiac output increased
(P < 0.05) in group E for 15 min after rocuronium. In group Es,
CO decreased (P < 0.05) at 3 and 6 min. Cardiac output was higher
in group E vs. group Es, 3–6 min post administration of rocuronium
(P=0.015).
Conclusion: Pretreatment with E or Es appears to
affect the onset time of rocuronium by altering CO as measured with
the NICOTM (Non-Invasive Cardiac Output) monitor (Novametrix
Medical Systems Inc., Willingford, CO).
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
- TOP
Comparison
of end-tidal and transcutaneous measures of carbon dioxide during
general anaesthesia in severely obese adults
J. Griffin, B. E. Terry, R. K. Burton, T. L. Ray, B. P. Keller, A.
L. Landrum, J. O. Johnson and J. D. Tobias
Br
J Anaesth 2003; 91: 498–501
Background. Patients with severe obesity (body mass
index (BMI) greater than 35 kg m–2) present difficulties
for end-tidal carbon dioxide (
CO2)
monitoring. Previous studies suggest that transcutaneous (TC) carbon
dioxide measurements could be valuable, so we compared
and TC measures with PaCO2 in severely obese patients
during anaesthesia.
Methods. We studied patients with severe obesity
(BMI
40
kg m–2) undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Carbon
dioxide was measured with both
and TC devices. The difference between each measure (
CO2and
TC-CO2) and the PaCO2 was averaged
for each patient to provide one value, and data compared with a non-paired,
two-way t-test, Fisher’s exact test.
Results. We studied 30 adults (aged 18–54 yr,
mean 41, SD 8.0 yr; weight: 115–267 kg, mean 162, SD 35 kg).
The absolute difference between the TC-CO2 and PaCO2
was 0.2 (0.2) (mean, SD) kPa while the absolute difference between
the
CO2
and PaCO2 was 0.7 (0.4) kPa (P<0.0001). The
bias and precision were +0.1 (0.3) kPa for TC vs arterial carbon dioxide
and –0.7 (0.4) kPa for
vs
arterial carbon dioxide.
Conclusions. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring
provides a better estimate of PaCO2 than
CO2
in patients with severe obesity.
Recovery of elderly patients from two or more hours of desflurane
or sevoflurane anaesthesia
J. E. Heavner, A. D. Kaye, B.-K. Lin and T. King
Br
J Anaesth 2003; 91: 502–6
Background: The solubility of desflurane compared
with sevoflurane suggests more rapid recovery from desflurane anaesthesia.
This could be important after prolonged anaesthesia and fast recovery
may be advantageous in the elderly where slow recovery of mental function
is a concern. We compared emergence from desflurane vs sevoflurane
in elderly patients undergoing two or more hours of anaesthesia.
Methods: Fifty ASA physical status I, II, or III
patients, 65 yr of age or older, undergoing anaesthesia expected to
last two or more hours were randomly assigned to receive desflurane/nitrous
oxide or sevoflurane/nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Patients were given
1–2 µg kg–1 fentanyl i.v. and anaesthesia
was induced with propofol 1.5–2.5 mg kg–1 i.v.
and maintained with either desflurane 2–6% or sevoflurane 0.6–1.75%
with nitrous oxide 65% in oxygen. Inspired anaesthetic concentrations
were adjusted to obtain adequate surgical anaesthesia and to maintain
mean arterial pressure within 20% of baseline values. Early and intermediate
recovery times were recorded. Digit-Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)
scores and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain and nausea were
recorded before pre-medication and every 15 min in the Post Anaesthesia
Care Unit (PACU) until patients were discharged.
Results: Early recovery times are given as median,
quartiles. The times to extubation (5 (4–9); 9 (5–13)
min), eye opening (5 (3–5); 11 (8–16) min), squeezing
fingers on command (7 (4–9); 12 (8–17) min); and orientation
(7 (5–9); 16 (10–21) min) were significantly less (P<0.05)
for desflurane than for sevoflurane. Intermediate recovery, as measured
by the DSST and time to ready for discharge from the PACU (56 (35–81);
71 (61–81) min) was similar in the two groups.
Conclusions: Early but not intermediate recovery
times of elderly patients undergoing a wide range of surgical procedures
requiring two or more hours of anaesthesia is significantly (P
0.05)
faster after desflurane.
Early recovery after remifentanil-pronounced compared with propofol-pronounced
total intravenous anaesthesia for short painful procedures
C. Hackner, O. Detsch, G. Schneider, S. Jelen-Esselborn and E. Kochs
Br
J Anaesth 2003; 91: 580–2
Background: We compared recovery from high-dose
propofol/low-dose remifentanil (‘propofol-pronounced’)
compared with high-dose remifentanil/low-dose propofol (‘remifentanil-pronounced’)
anaesthesia.
Methods: Adult patients having panendoscopy, microlaryngoscopy,
or tonsillectomy were randomly assigned to receive either propofol-pronounced
(propofol 100 µg kg-1
min-1;
remifentanil 0.15 µg kg-1
min-1)
or remifentanil-pronounced (propofol 50 µg kg-1
min-1;
remifentanil 0.45 µg kg-1
min-1)
anaesthesia. In both groups, the procedure was started with remifentanil
0.4 µg kg-1,
propofol 2 mg kg-1,
and mivacurium 0.2 mg kg-1.
Cardiovascular measurements and EEG bispectral index (BIS) were recorded.
To maintain comparable anaesthetic depth, additional propofol (0.5
mg kg-1)
was given if BIS values were greater than 55 and remifentanil (0.4
µg kg-1)
if heart rate or arterial pressure was greater than 110% of pre-anaesthetic
values.
Results: Patient and surgical characteristics, cardiovascular
measurements, and BIS values were similar in both groups. There were
no differences in recovery times between the groups (time to extubation:
12.7 (4.5) vs 12.0 (3.6) min, readiness for transfer to the recovery
ward: 14.4 (4.4) vs. 13.7 (3.6) min, mean (SD)).
Conclusions: In patients having short painful surgery,
less propofol does not give faster recovery as long as the same anaesthetic
level (as indicated by BIS and clinical signs) is maintained by more
remifentanil. However, recovery times were less variable following
remifentanil-pronounced anaesthesia suggesting a more predictable
recovery.
ANESTHESIOLOGY - TOP
Acetazolamide
Reduces Referred Postoperative Pain after Laparoscopic Surgery with
Carbon Dioxide Insufflation
Harvey J. Woehlck, M.D.; Mary Otterson, M.D.; Hyun Yun, Ph.D.
; Lois A. Connolly, M.D.; Daniel Eastwood, M.S. ; Krista Colpaert,
R.N.
Anesthesiology
2003; 99(4):924-928
Background: Carbon dioxide is the preferred insufflating
gas for laparoscopy because of greater safety in the event of intravenous
embolism, but it causes abdominal and referred pain. Acidification
of the peritoneum by carbonic acid may be the major cause of pain
from carbon dioxide insufflation. Carbonic anhydrase is an enzyme
that increases the rate of carbonic acid formation from carbon dioxide.
Because acetazolamide inhibits carbonic anhydrase, the authors hypothesized
that the pain caused by carbon dioxide insufflation may be decreased
by the administration of acetazolamide.
Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind
study of 38 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery during general
anesthesia was performed. Acetazolamide (5 mg/kg) or a saline placebo
was administered intravenously during surgery. Pain was rated on a
visual analog scale (0-10) at four times: when first awake, at discharge
from the recovery room, when discharged from the hospital, and on
the day after surgery. The site and quality of pain were recorded,
as were medications and side effects.
Results: Initial referred pain scores were lower
after acetazolamide (1.00 ± 1.98; n = 18) than after placebo
(3.40 ± 3.48; n = 20; P = 0.014), and 78% of patients
in the acetazolamide group had no referred pain; however, only 45%
patients in the placebo group had no referred pain. Incisional pain
scores were not statistically different, and referred pain scores
were similar at later times.
Conclusions: Acetazolamide reduces referred but not
incisional pain after laparoscopic surgical procedures. The duration
of pain reduction is limited to the immediate postsurgical period.
Comparative Neurotoxicity of Intrathecal and Epidural Lidocaine in
Rats
Yumiko Kirihara, D.V.M. ; Yoji Saito, M.D. ; Shinichi Sakura, M.D.
; Keishi Hashimoto, M.D. ; Tomomune Kishimoto, M.D.; Yukihiko Yasui,
D.D.S.
Anesthesiology
2003; 99(4):961-968
Background: Although there is a considerable difference
in the number of clinical reports of neurologic injury between spinal
anesthesia and other regional techniques, there are no animal data
concerning a difference in the local anesthetic neurotoxicity between
intrathecal and epidural administration. In the current study, the
functional and morphologic effects of lidocaine administered intrathecally
and epidurally were compared in rats.
Methods: Male rats were implanted with an intrathecal
or epidural catheter through L4-L5 vertebra in the caudal direction.
In experiment 1, to determine relative anesthetic potency, 16 rats
received repetitive injections of 2.5% lidocaine into intrathecal
or epidural space in different volumes and were examined for tail
flick test for 90 min. In experiment 2, to ascertain whether the relative
potency obtained in experiment 1 would apply to other concentrations
of lidocaine, additional rats received saline, 1%, 2.5%, or 5% lidocaine
in a volume of 20 or 100 µl through the intrathecal or epidural
catheter, respectively. In experiment 3, additional rats that received
saline, 2.5% lidocaine, or 10% lidocaine in a volume of 20 or 100
µl through the intrathecal or epidural catheter, respectively,
were examined for persistent functional impairment and morphologic
damage.
Results: In experiment 1, the two techniques produced
parallel dose-effect curves that significantly differed from each
other. The potency ratio calculated was approximately 4.72 (3.65-6.07):1
for intrathecal:epidural lidocaine. In experiment 2, every lidocaine
solution produced a similar increase in tail flick latency for the
two techniques. In experiment 3, five of eight rats given 10% intrathecal
lidocaine incurred functional impairment 4 days after injection, whereas
no rats in the other groups did. Significantly more morphologic damage
was observed in rats given 10% intrathecal lidocaine than in those
given 10% epidural lidocaine.
Conclusions: Persistent functional impairment occurred
only after intrathecal lidocaine. Histologic damage in the nerve roots
and the spinal cord was less severe after epidural lidocaine than
after intrathecal lidocaine. The current results substantiate the
clinical impression that neurologic complications are less frequent
after epidural anesthesia than after spinal anesthesia
Mouth Opening: A New Angle
Ian Calder, F.R.C.A.; John Picard, F.R.C.A.; Martin Chapman, F.R.C.A.;
Caoimhe O'Sullivan, M.A.; H. Alan Crockard, D.Sc., F.R.C.S.
Anesthesiology
2003; 99(4):799-801
Background: The authors hypothesized that craniocervical
extension occurs during normal mouth opening.
Methods: Twenty volunteers were studied. Interdental
distance was measured at four different degrees of craniocervical
extension.
Results: Interdental distance increased from 28 mm
(95% confidence interval, 25-30) in slight flexion to 46 mm (95% confidence
interval, 42-49) at full extension. Nearly maximal mouth opening was
obtained with 26 degrees (95% confidence interval, 22-30) of craniocervical
extension from neutral.
Conclusion: Craniocervical extension is an integral
part of complete mouth opening in conscious subjects. Fixation of
the craniocervical junction by disease, an internal or external fixation
device, or technique may restrict mouth opening, with consequences
for airway management.
Effect of Auditory Evoked Potential Index Monitoring on Anesthetic
Drug Requirements and Recovery Profile after Laparoscopic Surgery:
A Clinical Utility Study
Alejandro Recart, M.D.; Paul F. White, Ph.D., M.D.; Agnes Wang, M.S.;
Irina Gasanova, Ph.D., M.D.; Stephanie Byerly, M.D.; Stephanie B.
Jones, M.D.
Anesthesiology
2003; 99(4):813-818
Background:The auditory evoked potential (AEP) monitor
provides an electroencephalogram-derived index (AAI) that has been
reported to correlate with the central nervous system depressant effects
of anesthetic drugs. This clinical utility study was designed to test
the hypothesis that AAI-guided administration of the maintenance anesthetics
and analgesics would improve their titration and thereby provide a
faster recovery from general anesthesia.
Methods: Seventy consenting patients undergoing elective
general surgery procedures were randomly assigned to either a control
(standard clinical practice) or AEP-monitored group. Although the
AEP monitor was connected to all patients, the information from the
monitor was only made available to the anesthesiologists assigned
to patients in the AEP-monitored group. In the AEP-monitored group,
the inspired desflurane concentration was titrated to maintain an
AAI value of 15-20. In the control group, the inspired desflurane
concentration was varied based on standard clinical signs. The AAI
values and hemodynamic variables, as well as end-tidal desflurane
concentrations, were recorded at 3- to 5-min intervals. The recovery
times to achieve a White fast-track score greater than 12 and an Aldrete
score of 10, as well as the actual duration of the PACU stay, were
evaluated at 5- to 10-min intervals. Patient satisfaction with recovery
from anesthesia was assessed using a 100-point verbal rating scale
at 24 h after surgery.
Results: The average intraoperative AAI value in
the AEP-monitored group was significantly higher than in the control
group (16 ± 5 vs. 11 ± 8, P < 0.05). Use
of the AEP monitor reduced the desflurane requirement by 26% compared
to the control group (P < 0.01). In addition, the AEP-monitored
group received less intraoperative fentanyl (270 ± 120 vs.
390 ± 203 mcg, P < 0.05) and more rapidly achieved
fast-track eligibility (29 ± 19 vs. 56 ± 41 min, P
< 0.05). The time required to achieve an Aldrete score of
10 (60 ± 31 vs. 98 ± 55 min) and the duration
of stay in the recovery room (78 ± 32 vs. 106 ±
54 min) were also significantly reduced in the AEP-monitored (vs.
control) group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Use of AEP monitoring as an adjunct to
standard clinical monitors improved titration of anesthetic drugs,
thereby facilitating the early recovery process after laparoscopic
surgery.
Severe Bradycardia during Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia Recorded
by an Anesthesia Information Management System
Jonathan B. Lesser, M.D.; Kevin V. Sanborn, M.D.; Rytis Valskys, M.D.;
Max Kuroda, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Anesthesiology
2003; 99(4):859-866
Background: Bradycardia and asystole can occur unexpectedly
during neuraxial anesthesia. Risk factors may include low baseline
heart rate, first-degree heart block, American Society of Anesthesiologists
physical status
-
blockers, male gender, and high sensory level. Anesthesia information
management systems automatically record large numbers of physiologic
variables that are combined with data input from the anesthesiologist
to form the anesthesia record. Such large databases can be scanned
for episodes of bradycardia.
Methods: To select spinal and epidural anesthetics
that did not also involve general anesthesia, 57,240 automated anesthesia
records were scanned. Obstetrical patients and patients younger than
age 12 yr were excluded. The electronic records selected were then
scanned for episodes of moderate (heart rate < 50 and
40
beats/min) or severe (heart rate < 40 beats/min) bradycardia.
Results: A total of 6,663 cases (11.6%) met the inclusion
criteria. Among the 677 cases of bradycardia (10.2%) were 46 cases
of severe bradycardia (0.7%). In the final multivariate logistic regression
analysis, baseline heart rate less than 60 beats/min (P
0.0001)
and male gender (P = 0.05) contributed significantly to risk for a
severe bradycardia episode (odds ratio [OR]), 14.1 and 95% confidence
interval [CI], 6.9-28.0, and OR, 2.1 and 95% CI, 1-4.3, respectively).
For the 631 episodes of moderate bradycardia (9.5%), the final multivariate
model included baseline heart rate less than 60 beats/min (OR, 16.2;
95% CI, 12.4-22.0), age younger than 37 yr (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7),
male gender (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8), nonemergency status (OR, 1.7;
95% CI, 1.2-2.4),
-blockers
(OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3), and case duration (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.6-2.4)
as significant risk factors. Time of occurrence of a bradycardia event
was distributed widely across the entire duration of a case.
Conclusions: Moderate or severe bradycardia may occur
at any time during neuraxial anesthesia, regardless of the duration
of anesthesia. Low baseline heart rate increases the risk for bradycardia.
PUB MED - TOP

Unilateral spinal block for outpatient knee arthroscopy:
a dose-finding study.
Borghi B, Stagni F, Bugamelli S, Paini MB, Nepoti ML, Montebugnoli
M, Casati A.
J Clin Anesth. 2003 Aug;15(5):351-6.
To evaluate the onset time, success rate, and recovery profile of
unilateral spinal anesthesia produced with 4 mg, 6 mg, and 8 mg of
0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Prospective, randomized, blinded study.
Outpatient anesthesia unit at a University Hospital. 90 ASA physical
status I and II outpatients, who were scheduled for elective knee
arthroscopy. After standard intravenous midazolam premedication (0.05
mg/kg) and crystalloid infusion (7 mL/kg) were given, patients were
placed in the lateral decubitus position on the operative side, and
randomly allocated to receive spinal block with either 4 mg (Group
4, n = 30), 6 mg (Group 6, n = 30), or 8 mg (Group 8, n = 30) of 0.5%
hyperbaric bupivacaine injected slowly (3 mL/min) with the needle
orifice directed toward the dependent side using a 25-gauge Whitacre
needle. The lateral decubitus position was maintained for 15 minutes.The
onset time of surgical block was 13 +/- 5 minutes in Group 4 and 10
+/- 4 minutes in Group 6 (p = 0.006), and 9 +/- 4 minutes in Group
8 (p = 0.002). The maximum level of sensory block on the operative
and nonoperative sides was, respectively, T(10) (T(12)-T(6)) and /
(/-L(2)) in Group 4 (p = 0.0005), T(8) (T(12)-T(6)) and / (/-L(5))
in Group 6 (p = 0.0005), and T(7) (T(12)-T(5)) and / (/-T(10)) in
Group 8 (p = 0.0005). A strictly unilateral sensory block was observed
in 27 Group 4 patients (90%), 28 Group 6 patients (93%) and 23 Group
8 patients (77%) (p = 0.28). Complete unilateral motor block was observed
in 29 Group 4 patients (97%), 28 Group 6 patients (93%),
and 28 Group 8 patients (93%) (p = 0.80). No failed blocks were reported.
Complete regression of spinal anesthesia required 71 +/- 20 minutes
in Group 4 (range: 40 to 110 min), 82 +/- 25 minutes in Group 6 (range:
30 to 160 min), and 97 +/- 37 minutes in Group 8 (range: 50 to 120
min) (p = 0.003).Hyperbaric bupivacaine 4 mg injected slowly through
pencil-point directional needles in patients who are maintained in
the lateral decubitus position for 15 minutes provided a surgical
block that was mostly restricted to the operative side and adequate
to perform knee arthroscopy, with a faster recovery profile than when
a 6 mg or 8 mg dose was used.
Lunar phase does not influence surgical quality.
Holzheimer RG, Nitz C, Gresser U.
Eur
J Med Res. 2003 Sep 29;8(9):414-8.
Introduction: 10.5% of the German population believes
in the effects of lunar phase on disease. The topic is hot in German
TV program. It is believed that at new moon the rate of bleeding complications
is increased and operations during the waning phase of the moon would
be best to avoid complications, pain and scaring. To our knowledge
the effect of lunar phase has not been studied in ambulatory surgery.
Patients and methods: 782 patients were evaluated
for complications and perception of the personal health after herniotomy,
haemorrhoidectomy and crossectomy with partial vein stripping with
or without phlebectomy as part of a quality control study. A questionnaire
has been sent out to the patients asking the patient to rate postoperative
pain, pain medication, restriction of daily activity, mental health
and emotion, status of complaints after the operation.
Results: In 782 patients (mean age 50 years) 866
operations were performed. There were no major complications and only
in 3.71% minor complications (local bleeding, haematoma, inflammation,
abscess, seroma, lymphatic fistula, dehiscence) were observed. The
operations were equally distributed to the lunar phases. Complications
and patient's subjective perception of pain, restriction of daily
activity, mental health and emotion, status of complaints after the
operation were not associated with a lunar phase.
Conclusion: The hypothesis that lunar phase influences
the outcome of ambulatory operations is not valid. With regard to
the organization of operations in the hospital and the patient's uncertainty
to decide the right time the lunar phase philosophy may have an socio-economic
impact not yet understood.
Office-based ambulatory anesthesia: outcomes of clinical practice
of oral and maxillofacial surgeons.
Perrott DH, Yuen JP, Andresen RV, Dodson TB.
J
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Sep;61(9):983-95; discussion 995-6.
PURPOSE: The delivery of office-based ambulatory
anesthesia services is an integral component of the daily practice
of oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs). The purpose of this report
was to provide an overview of current anesthetic practices of OMSs
in the office-based ambulatory setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To address the research purpose,
we used a prospective cohort study design and a sample composed of
patients undergoing procedures in the office-based ambulatory setting
of OMSs practicing in the United States who received local anesthesia
(LA), conscious sedation (CS), or deep sedation/general anesthesia
(DS/GA). The predictor variables were categorized as demographic,
anesthetic technique, staffing, adverse events, and patient-oriented
outcomes. Appropriate descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed
as indicated. Statistical significance was set at < or =.05.
RESULTS: The sample was composed of 34,191 patients,
of whom 71.9% received DS/GA, 15.5% received CS, and 12.6% received
LA. The complication rate was 1.3 per 100 cases, and the complications
were minor and self-limiting. Two patients had complications requiring
hospitalization. Most patients (80.3%) reported some degree of anxiety
before the procedure. After the procedure, 61.2% of patients reported
having no anxiety about future operations. Overall, 94.3% of patients
reported satisfaction with the anesthetic, and more than 94.7% of
all patients would recommend the anesthetic technique to a loved one.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study show that
the office-based administration of LA, CS, or DS/GA delivered via
OMS anesthesia teams was safe and associated with a high level of
patient satisfaction.